issue one - autumn 1987
This is where it all began, with a home computer, some headlines done on a plotter
(remember those? no, you probably don't) and a traced Silurian.
This fanzine has been a long time coming, and although you won't realise it, it is
actually several months late. This bodes well for the future ... But why are we here?
Existential philosophy aside, it goes like this ...
To begin at the beginning, my name is David Gibbs. I'm in the third year of an MA in
something-obscure (I won't say what - you'll only laugh) at St Andrews University, I'm
twenty years old (so please take anything I say on Sixties 'Who with a pinch of salt -
chances are I don't know what I'm talking about) and I like Doctor Who.
There are times when I wonder if liking Doctor Who is considered necessary in fandom,
judging by the destructive criticism all around. I have to confess that I'm not exactly
thrilled by the direction the programme seems to be taking at the moment but I'll try to
keep off that subject. Above all, this is a magazine of Doctor Who appreciation - in other
words, the writers will be talking about what they like in Doctor Who, not what they
dislike. In this way, I hope that Five Hundred Eyes may be a more optimistic, more
enjoyable read than some other merchants of doom. The danger here is that the articles may
become bland and uncritical, and certainly I don't think that any story is perfect, but on
the whole I hope that the enthusiasm of the writers for their favourite aspects of the
programme will shine through.
I have to confess that, with the exception of Warriors of the Deep, The Twin Dilemma
and The Ultimate Foe, I have never disliked a Doctor Who story when broadcast. I may not
think they're much good, but at least I enjoy them. This is the secret of the magic of
Doctor Who - to receive it in a child-like state of innocence. By all means analyse and
dissect later, but watch the programme with an open mind. You may be pleasantly surprised.
But that's enough of that. We've got a fanzine to get underway.